Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XLVII, R 1, O XLI, R 27 and O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Suits Released and Arrested by a Registered Cell Deed Trial Court Arrested in Permanent Trial Appeal accepted by The district judge and the trial court's order were set aside, which was reviewed, but rejected by the sole judge of the High Court's request for review, which requested a review request The decision was made without dealing with the applicants ??? Civil Miscellaneous Request for Extra Evidence That Justice Applicants' Abortion Amount \ The lawyer further claimed that the case was presented incorrectly by a lawyer who Had made a false confession in its place, claiming that the suit property was owned by the respondents, so I was wrong on the second. The pretext of the review request was sought by the applicants to discuss the main application on the merit, and that the lawyer who argued the case was, admittedly, from the chamber of the real lawyer, but the fact of the request for review was mentioned. I was not justified, the points raised by the civil judges were decided by a single judge after consciously applying the mind. At the time of the review petition hearing, the applicant was refused to review the request for additional evidence because when the document was sought to be submitted, the applicant was in possession when the case was decided but mentioned above. The document was neither submitted to the trial court nor before the Appellate Court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
