Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus STATE

An attempt to compel Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324, 337 D & 34 Kital Ahmed Bail, the grant of further inquiry from the accused was also injured in the incident and three persons were injured and so on. He was examined at the hospital. Where the victim was examined was a question of version two, which party was attacked and which party was attacked, after the trial court had to decide after recording the evidence of the parties which brought the case to the accused. In the car. In section 492 of section 497, the PC accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD DURAB YOUSAF QURESHI AL-HASHMI v. Mst. MUNAWAR SULTANA 2010 CLC 803
• AKHTAR ZAMAN KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 804
• SARDAR KHAN v. SADIQ alias MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2010 MLD 805
• Mst. SAIMA AKHTAR ABBASI v. Malik MUHAMMAD BILAL AHMED 2010 YLR 806
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 812
• ASGHAR ALI v. State 2010 YLR 812
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Food v. MADINA JUTE MILLS LIMITED through Director 2010 CLC 812
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ v. Mst. SAADIA PARVEEN 2010 MLD 813

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Harnai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes