Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AKHTAR ZAMAN KHAN versus STATE


Section 497 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 3, 6, 7, 8, 8A, 14, 22, 23, 26, 33 (1) (5) (12) (13) (18), 34, 36 and the 38 Failure to submit a return on the due date, guarantee, grant of any offense by the accused does not fall under the prohibited provision of the CRPC; in such cases, the grant of bail was a principle while The refusal was exempt. On the aforementioned rule, out of maximum punishment of 5 years punishable under Sections 33 (12) and (13) of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the accused was already charged under the prison in the case, about 18 Had to face 18 months, the bail cannot be denied on the basis that he has done a great deal of damage to the state exchequer, the accused has been lodged in connection with the sales tax department's legal advisors in the same police station. And the case has been granted bail. Failure to indicate that the defendants returning from any specific feature failed to receive the same Relief Echo, was granted bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Hattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.