ABDUL RASHEED versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MIAN CHANNU
Section 5, Schedule and Section 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 151 and O. VIII, R10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Plaintiff did not file a case for dissolution of marriage on the basis of khola ? The statement was dismissed by the trial court's defense of non-submission of its written statement, although the option to discontinue the right to a written statement was not available to the Family Court, but if the words are included in section (2) of section 10 of the West Words The Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 expressly postponed the legislature's intention that the Family Court was neither helpless nor care to act as a defendant's silent observer in filing a written statement, as the section There are inherent options provided under 151. Family Court Family Court was competent to regulate its proceedings because no provision was made under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The marriage dissolution case was filed against the defendant due to every possible event and unexpected circumstances, but he was delayed in not filing the written statement of the Judge Family Court, in which case, the defendant's written statement was filed. Had no right to The order passed by the Family Court open to the exception was inherently interim / interim against which the constitutional petition was not upheld The constitutional petition was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
