Sections 2 (c) (i), 13 (2), (3) (c) (ii) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the payment of rent personally removes the tenant and personally The question of jurisdiction over personal rent controller scope as tenants was denied to the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties was rejected by both the rent controller and the appellate court simultaneously requesting the eviction, in this case The landlord and tenant relationship did not exist between the parties in search of a rent controller. The defendant had become a co-owner of the disputed store and could not be excluded until it was split. The tenant did not have jurisdiction over the tenant's controller's quest contradicts the tenant's request in his written response, and in the recorded evidence the tenant admitted his tenancy under the landlord's premises and The tenant also presented the tenant's payment to the court. He also admitted that he rented the shop, as well as the rent controller confusing the tenant's tenancy and the alleged co-owner's title in the case, which was not allowed after the two courts. The decisions are not relevant. After hearing the arguments of the parties' advice, the matter was set aside and the case controller was hired to decide the case.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
