Under sections 22A, 190, 193 and CHLII, the criminal justice system was subdivided into three phases of the investigative phase followed by the three stages related to the inquiry phase and the final phase for all three stages. Therefore, various authorities, such as police, law magistrates and sessions, were created and established by the courts. And their respective authorities / authorities were clearly defined. And a line of demarcation between these three stages was drawn with great clarity and the legislature's intention behind such a scheme was that these three authorities would not interfere with each other's jurisdiction during the interrogation phase. Will do The investment was made with the continued authority and the magistrate in some cases, and in some cases, the trial court / sessions court with the authority to monitor and investigate the process, but to the extent of the police, however, it was constituted. Invested with giving options. Opinion at the end of the investigation; and if an accused was prosecuted on the basis of the evidence / material collected by him, he may file a charge sheet against him, if on the contrary every one of the evidence If deficient, it can register canceled. The final decision to approve or invalidate the report's police opinion, however, should be reported to the magistrate or court authorized to confess to the matter in which the Justice of the Peace said it could not interfere. Nor can she give this order to the police. Under what clause of the preventive law, a charge sheet will be filed against an accused, because while doing so,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
