O VII, R 2 The suit to recover the plaintiff's money was that through an agreement between the parties, the plaintiff paid the plaintiff a suit for joint venture, but the defendant did not start the business and instead Used it for his money. When the defendant failed to refund the suit, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit for recovery of the damages, and the record agreement was signed by both parties and the minor witnesses, which stated that the minor Witnesses' money was paid by the plaintiff in the presence of the defendant was not brought to the defendant by the plaintiff, in the circumstances, the power of the agreement was successful in proving his case, the defendant's No evidence was revealed by the source that although the relevant witnesses are interested and inclined towards it The fact that the defendant can not be left aside the evidence of it, which has not been recorded refused to execute. He said that the contract signatures needed to apply to the trial court to compare their signatures by a specialist, but they failed to take advantage of this opportunity, otherwise, the courts were able to compare the signatures. Signature by handwriting was not required. The expert and it was also not required by law that the plaintiff's evidence was presented to the court by the plaintiff to prove the agreement. All the requirements of the law have been met and it is proved that the plaintiff has advanced the defendant in the case. Whoever wrote the proceedings does not necessarily become a witness, if f
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
