The delay of three hours and fifteen minutes from the definition of evidence in section 302 quotient, which was otherwise properly stated, was not fatal in the prosecution's case and depends on the circumstances of each case. Witnesses said in their testimony that the incident ended at a high speed playing a tape recorder by the accused, who had been objected to by the victim who had offended them and had committed the crime if he had Even if the motive is not proven, the offense can be lodged in the capital capital charge, unless the case is proved by the prosecution, the case will not be punished where the ocular evidence was present, the motive will not matter. As such, scarcity or any other motive was not proven to be a crime, in the present case, on the record of reliable ocular testimony There was enough that there is no need to prove the guilt of the accused and the motives. The forensic science laboratory report provided that vacancies caught fire from two different 7 62 MM bore rifles, which was sufficient and fully ocular evidence was confirmed by the defendant's lawyer objecting that the articles were sufficient. Delays were sent to the Chemical Examiner, which caused the report to be skeptical as the inspector could not comment. The forensic science laboratory report described the fatalities in the absence of objections to the tampering or the manipulation case, which clearly delayed the use of two different weapons to send articles to the laboratory. Had not arrived Room in the FIR
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
