Articles 2/2/324 Q / i Q I am in custody and the attempt to commit the murders was confessed on the busy road and within twenty minutes the report was immediately filed so that the complainant could be consulted and considered. There is no room for worry. / FIR itself was a controversial piece of evidence There was no previous bloodshed between the parties Prosecuting witnesses alleged that it was a shop dispute and that the motive was proven to be a crime and that The prosecution is supportive of the complainant. Although the victim was a brother, the testimony presented by the witnesses presented by him was credible, so there was no prior animosity to the blood, as the defense did not commit any ill will. The defense failed to identify, but no statement was found in his statement, nor did any witnesses identify any contradiction in the statement, but the witness was a natural witness to the incident and credibility was linked to his truth, the victim My relationship with the above witness, in the absence of enmity, will not reject his testimony, the statement of the injured witness submitted to the complainant. The version was fully endorsed, saying that the witness was not a close relative of the deceased nor the inclination towards the accused; the injury to his body suggested his presence was beyond reasonable doubt. Submitted, under the circumstances, it was weighed in as a natural and credible witness, all witnesses gave a contradictory statement that contained no contradictory medical evidence. Eye-witnesses will be picked up by the investigating officer, prepared by the investigating officer in the presence of the witness.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
