The trial court reversed the trial court's hearing of the provisions of Articles 6 and 13, but the appellate court overturned the trial court's decision / order, claiming that the defendant sought Failure to establish the performance and receipt of notice by the defendant's son was not established The plaintiff's case was that the informant informed him of the sale of the sale in the presence of two witnesses presented by all three witnesses. Supported the plaintiff's position on every material aspect. On the other hand, the appellate court should not have completely disregarded the three witnesses' permanent evidence, which could not be contradicted by them, which the plaintiff had proved to be the basis of the evidence sought by the evidence which was permanent. And there was impressive notice of confidence. Talab-e-Asad was sent to the plaintiff by the plaintiff / plaintiff in accordance with the law, needing to prove that the appellant's detection of the appellant on the relevant matter was not based on proper definition of evidence, by the appellate court. The judgment and order passed were set aside, and the trial court was reinstated.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
