HAROON RASHID versus EHSAN-UL-HAQ ALIAS IHSANULLAH
Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 367A, 365B & 376, abduction and rape guaranteed, for the first time by the police on the cancellation of the request for the respondents / accused by the victim girl. Was directly charged. As well as in its statement under section64 under, the CCP for Crime Commission as well as the Franz Science Laboratory report report supported its version, as in such matters as Family Honor and Future Risk and cost risk. The victim's case was one that occurred under the restrictions of section 497, CCP, no doubt, the bail granted by the court of competent jurisdiction generally was not interfered with, but if It turned out that it had been approved in violation. If the bail is approved and the rules established for the law in this regard, the High Courts will not refrain from interfering with the bail granted to the accused, these circumstances are withdrawn. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
