GADOON TEXTILE MILLS, SAWABI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Claims for huge refunds were pending despite the deduction of sections 33 and 202 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XVX of 2000), sections 2 (3) (i), 9 and 10 of which their names were pending. Land Revenue was against and customs officials alleged that Inland Revenue had deducted the money from the instructions of the customs authorities, yet the complainant's return claim was pending with the complainant's customs that the customs authorities The complainant's return claim should have been approved and then the amount must be deducted to determine the recovery process. The complainant's claim was valid, the delay in regulating the claims of a taxpayer and the recovery of official duties from him was discriminatory, unfair and unfair, plus the established notions of equality and good governance. Recommended that the Federal Board of Revenue decide on the complainant's refund claim within fifteen days with the ability of the Federal Board of Revenue; resolve taxpayer's pending refund claims simultaneously. Issuing a policy directive to field formations to reduce and reduce receipts if taxpayers For the realization of the government's liabilities is one of the approved refund before to force its compliance measures and be reported. Within twenty days
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
