Find a Lawyer

SULTEX INDUSTRIES versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

455 to 460 Order of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Sections 2 (3), 9 and 10 Offer of return of claim for delay in payment of office duty when providing exporters as an incentive to remain competitive. It was supposed to delay the payment to the Federal Board of Revenue / Collectorate, giving priority to the scheme's claimants when they would file either a writ or complaint handling the issue of duty draw. I was in breach of delay, ignorance and incompetence. The Ombudsman recommended that the Federal Board of Revenue instruct the chief collector to settle the complaint claim within 30 days of law. Establish a committee of relevant officials of the Collectorate Export to develop viable strategies to eliminate unacceptable levels of delay in processing claims. Claim all pending refund claims, as required by law, within three months and submit a monthly progress report to the Federal Tax Ombudsman Secretariat \ r \ n

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011

• GADOON TEXTILE MILLS, SAWABI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1222
• PORT QASIM AUTHORITY, KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1225
• ABDUL WAHEED v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1228
• DURRANI TRADERS, QUETTA v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1237
• SAITA (PAKISTAN) (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1245
• MONDAY BABA, KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1254
• ASLAM PERVAIZ v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1260
• MALIK PAPER MART, KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 1266

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2011 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes