ABDUL WAHEED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 168, 169 and 181 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance (XXV of 2000), excluding the application for release of a vehicle confiscated on payment of duty and taxes payable by section 9 and 10, equal to 5% of the secured price. The vehicle was imported which was sold in the market after obtaining permission from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from the Ministry of Duty and Taxes by the Consulate General of a foreign country, after registering, the complaint was finally filed by the complainant. / Arrived in the hands of the owner, from whom customs authorities are responsible for non-payment of dues and taxes. The original order of the deputy collector customs was ruled that the appeal filed against the order through the complaint was accepted by the collector (appeal), who allowed the release of the vehicle on payment of dues and taxes. The complainant's feeling that the appeal was aggravated with the order was primarily due to the complaint that being in the fifth part of the vehicle is due to the e-year, demanding more duties and taxes in the same way. There was an unfair process after which the customs authorities forced the last buyer to confiscate the vehicle or pay applicable taxes / duty, discretion, negligence. The first and foremost buyer was just and solely responsible for non-payment of duty / tax, unless it established that subsequent buyers worked closely with it, making recommendations to the Federal Board of Revenue They should allow the complainant, First Fax, an innocent buyer, to use the vehicle for that reason. Payment of duty / tax in the meantime \ a security device of betel nut and in the meantime
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
