DURRANI TRADERS, QUETTA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 21, 35 and 41 constitute the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), section 2 (3) (i) (B) (D) (ii), 9 and 10 on duty on exported goods 43 shipment of vegetable ghee was denied, and customs filing duty drop invoice claims in connection with 30 consignments with full documentation denied the malpractice claims on the grounds that the vegetable ghee was non-vegetarian. Standard and the complainant originally filed an appeal against the order. Collector Customs (Appeals) actually accepted the complainant's appeal against the order and the complainant's claim was accepted in the Supreme Court when it was stated that 30 claims were finally settled in favor of the complainant. Filed 13 claims from Due to the late filing of the claims that the goods were exported by them, Customs rejected claims of 13 goods which according to the customs duty owed the complainant in 30 similar cases. After allowing a drop claim, the remaining 13 cases were denied duty drop claims in a series of 13 cases, with Deputy Collector Customs admitting that he had initially filed a lawsuit against him. The complainant's claim, if not punished in time, is correct, the legal claimant's explanation for the long delay in filing 13 claims after the fight was compelling and reprehensible, moreover , There was no justification for stopping it. An exporter's money, simply because of the time limit, when he offered a plausible explanation for the delay in filing a return claim, helped customs determine the exact circumstances of the matter.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
