PORT QASIM AUTHORITY, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 53, 54, & 55 & 12 12, (AA) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) (i), 9 & 10 Tax Absence In spite of this, it was requested that the Federal Board of Revenue and the Chief Commissioner be directed to cancel the wrong order passed under Section 122 (5A) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 on the basis that Complainant was available tax deductions from the relevant year, but there was a hypothetical demand for money by incorrectly forming the 2001 inaccessible provisions of the Income Tax Ordinance, by the departmental officials, to correct the error and commission. Pointing out the disrespect and illegality of the department, such behavior of the officers of the department also showed a tendency to involve the taxpayers in the long and unlawful litigation, and in this case the misconduct of the officials of the department was established. , Which was malicious under sect. Ion 2 (3) (i) Formation of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office, 2000 recommendations were submitted to the Federal Board of Revenue within 7 days for reporting the implementation of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's preliminary recommendations. Adopt transparent measures to eliminate financial measures, especially to prevent large-scale cash flows. Inquire and initiate appropriate disciplinary proceedings against officials responsible for corrupt, discriminatory and arbitrary conduct in this case and a compliance report will be sent within 10 days on the first recommendation and 45 days on the second and third. n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
