SH. ZAFAR ABBAS versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 120A & 214A Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Sections 2 (3), 9 and 10, dismissing the complaints filed by the scheme complainants dismissed had gone. The complainant had filed the investment tax on time for payment of investment tax in respect of the unrelated income, but the declaration on fixed forms was not submitted in due time, but was filed with a delay of 33 days. Representatives could not indicate that registration could be delayed. The complainant had an impact on the revenue that there was no clause in the scheme of issuing showcase notices to the filers late in the declaration, which could delay the filing of a negative statement of the principles of the Federal Board of Revenue. Section 214A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, dismissed without the opportunity of the complainants, the Department hearing, in some cases, acted arbitrarily in section 2 (3) of the establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance. According to the error I mentioned, the recommendations were made to the Federal Board of Revenue in 2000 to provide an opportunity for a hearing. Complainant; and decide the case of the President within 30 days, keeping in mind the President's Decree No. 1069 2007 and report compliance within 45 days.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
