AMIR MUHAMMAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Offices 1868, 171, 216 and 217 Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000) Anti-smuggling by possession of goods fit for customs custody suspected of trafficking of sales tax invoice issued by the supplier. Stopped and shown. It was claimed that the goods were not smuggled from the non-tax area but were being legally relocated from their business premises under the proper documentation in the case of sales tax invoice. Was rejected and a vehicle was seized along with the goods and a recovery memo was issued to confiscate the goods and the vehicle. Information was also obtained after the incident to prove the lie. The corrupt motives behind such an occupation were not established by Customs Supervisory Management. It was highly undesirable to review such cases and to engage in such acts with the exploitation of the customs staff, as the commission and mistrial provisions 2 (3) (i) and (ii) the seriousness of the nature of the establishment of the Federal Tax Office was identified. Ombuds Ordinance, 2000 The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends that the Federal Board of Revenue determine the responsibility and take action against the customs officials responsible for mismanagement and corruption in the Customs Anti-Trafficking Inspector's case. Accepted under section 22 of setting up the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, as the driver of the car is compensated by Rs. 50,000 for loss of business.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
