WASEEM ALI versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, PUNJAB
Article 199 Demand Request Contract Employee Civil Service Termination Service Termination Service Lack of Ownership Extension and Regular Denial of Service By an advertisement made by an initial appointment authority based on a degree not recognized by the Higher Education Commission The requirement was made that the degree should be recognized by the commission. Accordingly, the initial appointment of the applicant was not made to the degree recognized by the Commission against the advertisement mentioned by the Authority on the basis of which the applicant was appointed. At the time of the appointment, it was not necessary that the degree should be recognized by the Commission, which was created by the authority to extend or refuse the applicant's service, as he obtained the initial appointment on the basis of degree. An agency which was not recognized by the Commission was akin to defaming the applicant and the allegation by the authority was completely misunderstood and the applicant could not be considered guilty. Received his initial appointment on the basis of a degree which the High Court lacks. Observed that even if the allegation against the applicant is considered to be valid, then it is a matter of gross negligence and lack of ownership by the authority who employed a person who did not meet the eligibility criteria, e.g. However, furthermore, if it was also considered that there was an error in making the initial appointment, then the question arises as to why the applicant did not make such an error during the entire period of the contract service. Noted? Request yards
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
