Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 West Pakistan Stability Ordinance (VI 1960), Section 26 Declaration was filed in 1906 on the basis of a civil court order filed for the plaintiff. Shares of the parties determined and declared but the stability authorities replaced the shares of the parties through the variation The plaintiff claimed that the stability officials were not eligible to replace the shares declared / appointed by the civil court in the trial court. Filed the appeal by the defendant, which was rejected by the appellate court. Section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 and Article 26 of the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance 1960 explicitly banned the jurisdiction of the civil court in the present case and the matter was banned. In addition, the tax authorities were not imposed despite the necessary parties. Revenue authorities, by law, did not have the authority to prosecute the civil court order because the plaintiffs' claim was related to their share in the property declared by the civil court in 1906, which involved a dispute between the parties. The share claim was based on a civil court-approved ruling, therefore, when the defendant requested the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960, the plaintiff's opinion was invalidated at the time of the trial. Cannot ban because revenue records have intact entries. The civil court's ruling was violated, which had exclusive jurisdiction to entertain only such a complex matter as the Revenue Code
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
