AHMAD SHER versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT CANAL OFFICER, JHELUM
Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1, and 2Suit, closed the store simultaneously to the interim order / irrigation authorities for declaration and permanent injunction. Plaintiffs were receiving drinking water and defendants from. The plaintiffs' land was transferred to another shop, irritated by the orders of the irrigation authorities, the plaintiff sued for declaration and permanent injunction, the trial court granted interim relief to the plaintiffs and interim relief on interim relief. The issue of the case has been a problem since 2009. , And there was no progress in this case. In the case of interim relief, it was the mandate of the law that the interest of all parties involved should also be included in addition to the fact that the irrigation authorities did not. Irrigation water supply was expressed in favor of illegal adaptation, unless evidence was brought on record by the plaintiffs unless there was a defect. There was also a satisfactory supply that had been discontinued. As an interim measure, the injunction for the High Court was premature because it was detrimental to the defendant's need for irrigation. An arrangement that should benefit the interests of all irrigators, both the plaintiffs and the defendants, yet such arrangements cannot fully satisfy such persons, though it is claimed that the second store, which includes the plaintiff's land. Was relocated, was unable to supply water satisfactorily
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
