Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 365B / 380/376, abduction or setting up a tent for marriage to a woman, etc., burglary in residence, arrest warrant before rape, further inquiry reported to police There is no evidence from the apparent extraordinary delay of the last three days that a writ petition was filed in the High Court against his father to show that the alleged kidnapper was either seduced or forcibly abducted. Had filed a complaint with the police for harassing and threatening to divorce the accused, whom he had voluntarily married. Had also attached his affidavit in this regard to the constitutional petition as well as the kidnapper had jointly filed another constitutional petition to cancel the existing FIR statement filed under section 161. The abductor, the PCP, contradicted the version of the FIR presented by the complainant; the prosecutor's story contradicted the medical. During the idence investigation, the accused prepared his photographs with the kidnappers whom he was marrying. Were. According to the FIR, he was sitting in a car parked in the street at the time of the incident and was not alleged to have entered the complainant's house, so he could not do the gold jewelry and the complainant's. Strike the accused's cash, so further investigation is required and he is granted bail in the circumstances before his arrest.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
