ABDUL KHALIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MINCHINABAD
Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXXVI, Rr 9 and 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application In order to determine the actual wrong number of suit land demarcation / limitation for appointment as Municipal Commissioner And the Khasra number in which the Tehsildar's report was located that limitation of suit land was not feasible for settlement in the populated area, rejecting the Tehsildar's report without the invitation of the parties to the trial court's order. Directs the Collector to appoint a Senior Revenue Officer. For this purpose, a review petition filed against the order rejected by the Additional District Judge was requested that the court may appoint the commission itself, or on the request of either party, the trial court passed an unclear order in the presence of the parties' counsel. In which the deputy collector submitted a demarcation and trial report. The court summoned the objections of the parties to which CPC Order XXVI, R 10 was sufficient to use such report as evidence of protective measures to protect the rights of both parties or otherwise defendant Blurred to indicate infringement of any rights, the courts approved invalid orders in jurisdictional litigation.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
