RASHID AHMED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suit for the Care of Daughters Against the Plaintiff's Parents / Daughters The majority of the suits / daughters have left the home and resided in a "charity" charitable organization. Yes, the father claimed that the daughters are disobedient and older women do not have the right to care for the children. The trial court decided to restore Rs 2500 for each daughter. Father's appeal if the children got majority, father. Older children were relieved of the responsibility of providing for life, where the daughter refused to seek the help of her father in personal matters such as marriage. Done, then the father could not afford to pay for his illegitimate and disobedient Dow's wedding expenses The Home Rehabilitation Allowance was paid for a child who was modest and used his bread, butter and other parts of his life. Unable to make money The father who chooses to leave his home will not be under any legal or moral obligation to maintain his child. This was especially so when the child was growing up, the major child could earn his livelihood himself, and such an older child did not come into the definition of "dependent" where the father was accused of having children in the property. Part of it disappears. His mother, no such dispute could lead to the recovery of father's care; the court could knock on the children in case of such a complaint; the courts below did not properly consider the matter. The constitutional request was accepted \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
