Section 2302 (b) Testimony of Qatil-Umid evidence Benefits of doubt The Inquirer report and to some extent the site plan Reliance Prosecution's witnesses alleged that the suspect was armed with a 12-bore gun and that he had fired a shot. Has been convicted under Section 302 (b). PPC and trial court heard death sentence ??? During the spot inspection, the investigating officer collected 12 bore gun blank and 11 implants of 222 rifles from the scene but it was not a case of prosecution on which the accused reloaded the gun. ? At the scene of the incident, a 12-bore gun emptied shows a strange situation. There was no mention of the 12 bore vacant at the site of the incident in the investigation report and to some extent, which was sent to the fire expert during the investigation. A 12-bore gun was recovered from the suspect's possession by a forensic science laboratory and sent to a firearm expert, the gun was specifically cited in the FIR to trigger the incident but was triggered by the trial. No witness was presented to establish the incident, although Mainz Ray was always in the suspect's mind and did not necessarily have any known motive for the incident. But once an indictment is charged, the prosecution must be established in the same way and if it fails, it should suffer damages, the prosecutor has not been able to prosecute the accused beyond reasonable doubt, therefore, Given the benefit of the doubt, he was entitled to acquit the superior. The court sentenced the accused through trial court and set aside the sentence and he was acquitted of the charge.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
