Section 9 (b) (c) was prepared as a model for drug possession and trafficking chemical inspection, but advisers were silent about the fact that many bars reported that 12 samples were produced by prosecutors. The witness also failed to state how many packets or how many bars of 12 parcels of 10 mercury each chemical was prepared for testing because all packets would not be opened, so it would be considered Samples were not drawn from the packet, and every rod administration drug drug act, 1997, was strictly used to present such evidence. I was. Expert Report on the Prohibited Export Issue In the present case, for safe administration, the sample was not hidden from every prohibited member. According to justice, it would be considered that 12 samples weighing 10 grams (12 grams) were prepared with only 12 bars. And for the rest of the bars, if no sample was drawn from them, it would not be possible to suppose that they were the cannabis bars, or else the situation raised a reasonable doubt, which cannot be ignored in the delivery of justice. Described as the Golden Rule, it was primarily a rule of tactics, and in situations that raise reasonable doubt in the mind of the wise, it cannot be ignored. And the benefit was to be extended to the accused, the prosecution established its case against the accused to the extent of recovery from the Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act 1997, which was changed to section 9 (b). He said that the Act accused have been sentenced for a pre-existing period, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
