NOOR FLOUR MILLS THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR versus JUDGE BANKING COURT BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Section 10 Request for leave to defend fact and law questions Uncontroversial order Banking court pleads without discussing factual points and pleading with the law without considering provocative and on-record documents Was excluded as a result of which the judgment was pronounced was to expedite the decision of the bank transactions on matters relating to commercial transactions and transactions, for which financial institutions (Recovery of Finance) under the provisions of the Ordinance 2001 Specific procedures and systems were provided, in matters relating to commercial transactions The documents were executed on behalf of the parties in relation to their rights and responsibilities, which had to be given weight / debate and the decision passed by the Banking Court could not be declared a speechless verdict because the Banking Court was upset by the defendants. Failure to make any decision on facts and law Record documents filed by the parties in the High Court discussed the decisions and decree passed by the Banking Court, Section 10 of the Financial Institutions (Financial Recovery) Ordinance, 2001 Ben to decide the petition filed by the defendant under Ng was the Court's remand, which had been allowed under appeal.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
