Section 808080 and un 457 law evidence (of 10 of 1984 of the), Article 117 Defendant's testimony, rather than considering evidence presented by the prosecution for theft, domestic crime or breaking the house at night. Based on an assessment that was neither appropriate nor legal, apart from any plea made on the other hand, the defense, the prosecution, had to prove the matter beyond doubt and carried such a burden. Even in this case, when the accused did not move to the other side of the case where the accused failed to establish a specific plea in his defense, the initial burden was on the prosecution to establish all the cases that the prosecution had established. Was to set up a commission for theft by the side. The prosecution witness was merely a witness to the prosecution. His evidence had to be carefully and carefully evaluated as to why his presence could not be defined at the scene of the incident, after the complainant arrested the accused and reported the case to both the complainant and the alleged crime witness. Cannot exclude the possibility. The witnesses failed to substantiate each other's trial court statements, and the appellate court failed to appreciate the facts of the case and several orders were made to exercise jurisdiction over them without giving the suspect the benefit of the doubt. And the accused was acquitted of the crime.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
