Section 115 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54, and the trial court and the lower appellate court for dismissal of a permanent injunction dismissed the trial of the accused when a proper examination of the material available on record. A valid conclusion was drawn. Following the proper review of the trial court's verdict and verifying the judgment, considering the evidence available on the record, both the courts below found that it had neither the misdiagnosis of the evidence. Or face any legal weakness. It is not liable to be disturbed by the High Court by exercising its jurisdiction to review, even if re-evaluating, a second opinion was possible.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
