Find a Lawyer

SYED NADIR SHAH versus THE STATE THROUGH FIA

Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Section 22 (b) Receiving money for the provision of foreign employment, the accusation against the accused was that he and his sons sent the complainant on the pretext of being sent abroad. Was charged with up to 14 years for the alleged crime. The accused was named in the FIR allegations because the complaint contained in the FIR was supported by the complainant and the prosecution witnesses, the prosecution case was at an early stage and deepening the evidence of the prosecution at the bail stage. Could not speak appreciation. Under the circumstances, the defendant's request for bail was rejected

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011

• NIAZ GUL v. Malik MUNIR AHMED 2011 CLC 1150
• ASIMULLAH v. Haji ABDUL BARI 2011 PCrLJ 1166
• ABDUL WAHID v. State 2011 MLD 1208
• ATTIQ AHMED KHAN v. NOOR-UL-SABA 2011 CLC 1211
• NOOR FLOUR MILLS through Sole Proprietor v. JUDGE BANKING COURT BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA 2011 CLD 1263
• Dr. SABA DURRAZI v. CHAIRMAN, HOUSE ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE/ SECRETARY, S&GAD 2011 PLC(CS) 1378
• AKHTAR MUHAMMAD v. Malik ABDUL HAMEED 2011 CLC 1379
• QAISAR KHAN v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, QUETTA 2011 PLC(CS) 1387

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Lawrence pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes