In the payment of rent of Sections 13 and 15, the eviction on the basis of default to the tenant, even though the tenant was submitting rent to the civil court of the court, was not collecting the rent at the original rate, but the tenant's original rate was evening. 500 rupees, but the tenant had to submit rent for Rs 150. The receipt document prepared by the tenant was tampered with and the tenant intentionally paid less to the tenant than the actual rent. The rent was submitted. The rent controller correctly accepted the homeowner's eviction request as default in payment. The tenant's advice to the tenant failed to indicate any misreading or reading of evidence in the record, nor could any legal weakness, malpractice or misconduct be identified, the rent controller said on the evidence on record. Was correctly praised by the rental controller as legal and valid. The appeal cannot be interfered with, even in such circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
