Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Act (IV of 1884), Section 4 (1) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 of the Law of Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 40 Explosion threatened lives or property I could put in an attempt to cause an explosion, or to create or keep explosives with the intent to endanger lives and property, to try to commit a murder, by several people in a joint intent offer. The actions taken, the testimony apprehended by the prosecution, was taken by the prosecutor to the advantage of the suspect in the meaning of section 4 (1) of the Explosive Act, 1884, because the wire was not used. The explosives could not be detected because the aforementioned ballistic expert was not sent, especially in the absence of anything recovered. Only the accused was seen fleeing the scene but did not see them blasting / making any pistol recovery memorandum nor empty S and pistol were sent to a ballistic expert to carry the pistol to the crime commission. To prove the use. Although the complainant's house was located in a populated area, no independent witness was concerned with the location. The testimony of witnesses in the case of the death penalty should be examined with caution and carefully, and the illegal and irrational disclosure of the accused cannot be the basis of his conviction, as this law is not required in the 1984 Article Was not acceptable under 40. In the strange hours of the night, the suspect's body was found
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
