MUHAMMAD ALI SATAKZAI versus APPOINTING AUTHORITY OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGES
Constitutions 4 and 5 Constitutions Pakistan, Arts 175 and 199 Constitutional Requests Appointment of Balochistan Additional District and Sessions Judges Authority Appointment of Balochistan Public Service Commission Applications for Appointment of Additional District and Sessions Judges Registrar, High Court Applicants Additional District and Sessions Judges challenged the jurisdiction of the Balochistan Public Service Commission while serving on ad hoc basis through a post issued by the petitioners, saying that the Balochistan Public Service Commission did not have the powers to make such requests. Invite, test and interview Traditional and recommend the appointment of judicial officers. For the applicants, the powers conferred on the Commission under R5 of the Balochistan Additional District and Sessions Judges Service Rules 2002 were against the provisions of Article 175 of the Constitution. While under the influence and influence of the Government, the appointment of Judicial Officers through the Commission cannot ensure the complete independence of the judiciary from the Executive even otherwise, appearing before the Public Service Commission, the Judicial The position and status of the party will have to be damaged. Such officers, who otherwise need to be protected, can only be so if they are asked to appear before the sitting judges of the High Court, which will ensure the dignity and dignity of the judicial office. As per Article 17575 of the Constitution, the supervision and control of the Judicial Officer under the Balochistan Public Service Commission was in violation of the provisions of the Constitution. Also, the Balochistan Public Service Commission did not have the authority to appoint such officers as the Additional District and Sessions Judge.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
