Find a Lawyer

KHALIQ DAD versus BIBI SAHIRA

Section 42 Trial Trial Trial Court Reverses Trial and Appeal Court Reverses Trial Court's Order Claiming to Hold Trial That Appellate Court Failed to Hold Has been in ownership since 1941, when the plaintiff was not his legal heir. Brother of the deceased brother of illegally valid oral / hearing evidence regarding the identity of the defendants was not enough to prove that they were the daughters of the defendant's deceased brother, to establish the identity of the defendant's sisters here No documentary evidence was actually present. Prepared as India and the defendants. A photocopy of any document that could not serve the purpose was not available in the record that the defendant's deceased brother had ever married. The trial court correctly reviewed the material while the appellate court erred in providing oral evidence. Without having to rely on the same property to this day, the identity of the defendants represented by the defendant's identity lawyer remains questionable while his attorney could not obtain immunity from the attorney's court, concluding that the material on record was helpful. Was not made while the appellate court's decision was upheld. The trial court was retained

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011

• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. JAMEEL AHMED 2011 MLD 76
• SHAHID HAKEEM v. ALTAF HUSSAIN AGHA 2011 PLD 76
• MUHAMMAD ALI SATAKZAI v. APPOINTING AUTHORITY OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGES 2011 PLC(CS) 78
• SHAM S-ULLAH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 162
• Haji ABDUL BARI v. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB-DEVISION QESCO 2011 YLR 215
• MEHRAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 261
• ALLIED PRECISION ENGINEERING PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD. v. J.HANDA KHAN MAREE 2011 PLC 286
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2011 PCrLJ 298

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2011 →

list of supreme court advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes