Section 3 (2) Appraising the Evidence of Illegal Occupancy on the Property The ocular account presented by the complainant's witness reveals this and proposes to believe that the company has no legal authority to lodge with the complainant. Had occupied an additional area of possession, the vacant possession in which the trial court's High Court Finding Officer Asceni had referred to the complainant seemed to have been done after proper scrutiny of the evidence, Court Needed No Interference Initially, the complaint was set up against the Managing Director of the company He had surrendered to the property in the capacity of his Managing Director, while at the time the accused was not on the scene and the accused later joined, under the circumstances, not criminally liable under the provisions of the illegal settlement. Could have been stopped. In order to compel an offense under section 3 (1) of the Act, 2005, the complaint must disclose that both the act was illegal and my transgression was somewhat different from the illegal possession because the former had taken possession of the property. Did not intend to name the accused without any legal justification after his organization was lodged a complaint and the accused was convicted by an unlawful verdict, was set aside and \ r \ nhe accused Was exempted from
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
