Find a Lawyer

MEHRAN versus STATE

Section 13 (e) non-possession of arms, etc. Testimonies Definition Benefit of Doubts Witnesses Receive Controversial Cartridges From Each Other Recovery Memo shows that the data was changed to `20 by data which was not verified by the trial court. The contradiction of the matter was lost, on the last day of his physical remand, the suspect's disclosure before the police had raised doubts about the authenticity and recovery of the incident from which the house was recovered. There was no witness. The special seizure of the accused in the trial was highly suspicious The trial court failed to bring the suspect to the High Court, while giving the suspect the benefit of the suspect, he was acquitted of the charge. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ALI SATAKZAI v. APPOINTING AUTHORITY OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGES 2011 PLC(CS) 78
• SHAM S-ULLAH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 162
• KHALIQ DAD v. Bibi SAHIRA 2011 CLC 200
• Haji ABDUL BARI v. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB-DEVISION QESCO 2011 YLR 215
• ALLIED PRECISION ENGINEERING PRODUCTS (PVT.) LTD. v. J.HANDA KHAN MAREE 2011 PLC 286
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2011 PCrLJ 298
• SHADI KHAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 328
• FATEH KHAN v. SHER KHAN 2011 YLR 332

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2011 →

how to become a advocate from Karak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes