Sections 13 (3) (a) (i), 11 and 13 revoke the default ground for payment of the tenant and deny the claim of the landlord and the landlord's personal needs of the tenant. That residential building is a residential building. The landlord may not need the Val for commercial use. He may refer the court authorized to establish his court in the house because no order for deciding the title of property could be made under the West Pakistan Civil Rental Ordinance, 1959 for the respondent being the son of the late / previous landlord. It was within the meaning that the landlord had attained the status. The West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction was a residential building covering section 2 (c) of the Ordinance, 1959, therefore, seeking permission from the rent controller to convert the landlord to a non-residential building under section 11 of the West Pakistan Urban Was necessary. The Rent Restraint Ordinance, 1959, failed to establish the landlord's personal requirement; the tenant produced photocopies of the rent payment challan. The landlord had failed to present a notice regarding the change of property to the tenant. West Pakistan Citizens Rental Restrictions As per Section 13A of the Ordinance, 1959, the issue of rent payments to the father / previous landlord may arise in cases where the landlord could not prove the default land for payment of rent. The trial court erroneously ruled that the appeal for the case was accepted, and the decision was set aside.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
