CREEK MARINA (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS\' HOUSING AUTHORITY
Section 309 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 42 and 56 suit containing declaration and injunction interim order, to prevent application The defendant was the plaintiff. There was a dispute with the defendant in connection with some payments from the construction company and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff company to prevent the plaintiff from filing the plaintiff's petition. The plaintiff was not yet a creditor to the plaintiff company. That the lenders were permitted to submit a solicitation application under section 309 of the "Indigenous" or \ Possible \ Companies Ordinance, 1984, the chances of success of the application submitted by such lenders were remote and windup. Before the order was made, such lenders had to present a strong case, even if the loss was irreparable. Yes, the court could issue a proper decree, if it were significant and the plaintiff engaged in the construction of a high-profile Ion project that had hundreds of people booked flats and apartments, such as a petition seeking publicity and Submission to the plaintiff will result in substantial loss and loss to the plaintiff, and its commercial activities will be severely jeopardized due to loss of public confidence. Unlawfully compromised, the loss to the plaintiff would be significant and substantial, if not irrevocable, then the equity is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, as in the case of interim relief, the High Court awarded the plaintiff company with the plaintiff company. Was prevented from filing a termination request. Permission to apply in circumstances based on the claim stated in the notice of claim
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
