Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN MOTLANI versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF

The suit for the recovery of the O VI, R 17 case was decided by the defendants on admission under O VI R 17, the CPC dismissed the defendant in the appeal for transfer to one of the defendants, Before the trial is valid, the trial shows that the applicant and the second defendant in the case who failed to return the money to the plaintiff after the trial were tried, tried to crack And to create confusion and trouble would be equivalent to changing all forms of litigation in a case that did not claim such a change. Or the applicant and the defendants' intention was to reject rulings of the trial in the trial.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• Syed MUJAID HUSSAIN SHAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Health Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 1519
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. v. DEPARTMENT OF EXCISE OF TAXATION 2012 PTD 1522
• IQBAL KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1524
• CREEK MARINA (PRIVATE) LIMITED v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS\' HOUSING AUTHORITY 2012 CLD 1525
• JAFFAR v. State 2012 MLD 1532
• MASTER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2012 CLC 1532
• MOUJ ALI v. THE STATE 2012 PCrLJ 1538
• Mst. KULSOOM FATIMA v. State 2012 YLR 1543

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Shakargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes