MASTER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH
Sections 10 and 15 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petitioner, during cross-inspection, admitted that it had stopped the payment of the tenant for a certain period, that the payment was not deliberately default. Too much farm, because, if the landlord refuses to receive rent payments, such rent is tendered by a money order and after the refusal of the same money order, under section 10 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979. The rent could have been deposited with the controller. The landlord was never sent by the applicant, and for this reason, there was a default decision made by the tenant intentionally and intentionally if the landlord did not even accept the rent once. If so, it was the tenant's responsibility to submit the rent under section 10 to the court. The Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, which did not make a constitutional request, was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
