TARIQ IQBAL KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR
Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request Under the Inquiry pending inquiry into the sale of shares in the company against the accused by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), the accused (applicant) named in the Execution Control List. The convictions were that someone was going to be prosecuted and was just being investigated by NAB officials because of what was assigned in the invalid memorandum, because the accused's name was on the control list. There has been no mention in the memorandum that the Government has made it in the public interest Not be considered to define the IDE was barred from traveling abroad for which it had been deprived of his legal right to know what was going to not only affected the Memorandum of error. As a result he was deprived of the opportunity to be heard, which was the basic right of every citizen, and he was denied his right to comply with the law, the inquiry against the accused was a long trial and So far, no trial has been conducted. , Civil or criminal, was prosecuted yet no authority was ever investigated against the accused by any authority, comparing self-inquiry with NAB authorities to keep the accused's name under control. Or did not justify. The list did not provide any reasonable grounds for maintaining this name in the above list, and the defendant's fears, without any reasonable or reasonable substance or scope to support him, maintained the name of the accused. Will not provide justification for Exit Control List Impeded
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
