SYED MUJAID HUSSAIN SHAH versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Article 199 Constitutional application in the civil service was at trial with the applicant university in the installation service and its service was justified On the one hand, the university claimed that the applicant allegedly committed serious moral misconduct. I was involved and on the other hand, the authorities have stated that the applicant was guilty and therefore, his job was terminated on account of poor performance. No material was kept by the university on the request. The performer's performance was automatically reviewed for any allegations that were subsequently made The subject of the FIR became the subject and afterwards the University came to the conclusion that the applicant's performance was not satisfactory. And then, it was decided to terminate his service, which indicated the termination during the prosecution period was not the performance of the applicant but some of the allegations leveled at him, the removal of the applicant from the constitutional jurisdiction The use of options was a matter of compelling exercise. The order of dismissal of the applicant and the reinstatement was ordered The High Court directed that the applicant will execute the crime and it is available to the authorities to take disciplinary action against the applicant and if he If the crime proves according to the rules then take action accordingly. The Constitution dealt with the rules accordingly. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
