Sections 302 and 460 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-X of 1965), Section 13 (e) Qatil-e-Adh, to commit a domestic crime or to break into the house at night, to take advantage of the suspect (s) without possession of unlicensed weapons. Sentenced and sentenced. The trial court's charge of committing a domestic crime in the complainant's house and killing his brother and possessing unlicensed weapons, which was allegedly recovered on the accused's conviction, was that the evidence was based on evidence. The difference is. And medical evidence; that no one was recovered by chance. It has not been reported in the FIR or through any witnesses that the suspect injured or shot the victim. It was not affiliated with a private adviser at the time of the alleged arms seizure and was also recovered from a place which the accused did not have, which is a wound of accuracy for the victim, as stated in the post-mortem report. was not. In the FIR and with the statement of a prosecution witness, no crime was recovered from the crime scene. The FIR reported that the incident took place inside a wall where the sheep were kept, but the accused and his co-accused None of the alleged firearms was targeted by. In any crowd or ground that raised the suspicion as to whether the incident was as alleged. The investigating officer said the recovered weapon was sent to a ballistic expert, but there were no reports submitted by the expert that the alleged recovery was delayed. Appeals from the suspects also arising out of the weapon were allowed and he was the suspect
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
