Section 249, 249A & 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) / 337F (i) / 147/149 Cancellation of Shahja's sentence, impeachment, uproar and illegal assembly orders The orders were approved by the magistrate, one under section 249, and the other under section 249A, CRPC, both the sessions court upheld the validity of the orders in section 249, CRPC authorized the magistrate. Had not given time for the complainant to appear and if he had failed to do so, then the magistrate, on the basis of compliance with the legal matters, was found under Section 249A, CR PC The order to acquit Zaman was not approved, but it did pass an order under which section 249 directs Section HO to stop proceedings under the CCPC within a month. Along with the file of the complaint, which failed, the accused will be acquitted under Section 249A, CRPC was the original order under which the second order of acquittal by the accused was merely a cosmetic which At the request of the police and its recommendation, the accused was acquitted, though in practice the accused was acquitted by a prior order, which is highly unconstitutional Negative, Unlawful and Unauthorized Order The provisions of section 249A, CRPC, were not complied with by the magistrate nor were any prosecutors heard, nor given any impression. That the accusation against the accused was baseless or that there was no possibility of punishment. Even in this case, there were no reasons given by the magistrate in support of its findings, the magistrate
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
