The use of Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 419/420/468/471 as fraud, forgery, and forged document was not on the record that any action or pro-note between the parties to the FI. The AR was written, which was based on an FIR, but the complainant made deliberate and dishonest improvements during his examination to cover the error of his case. The complainant, the documents were first prepared and prepared for exhibition, which were not prepared during the investigation, which were material irregularities and such documents were of no importance to the law. Was not occupied with a sample signature. The bank manager obtained his account at the time of opening the prosecution failed to get the expert's opinion from the laboratory, as well as the card opening account, except the statement of the accused's complainant, the prosecution's time and place. Failed to prove. And in whose presence the contentious check was delivered to the complainant courts below, it was not justified to rely on the documentation of the complaint presented for the first time during the trial, the trial court of the prosecution said. Exposed by the source, there were contradictions. The instability and instability of any and independent witnesses was set aside to confirm the prosecution's decision below, and the accused was already acquitted on bail. Was.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
