HAKIM KHAN versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION, DISTRICT SWABI
Claims for Articles & 54 and 54 54 Case Declaration and Permanent Order Settlement The plaintiffs set the case for declaration, so that they are entitled to one-third of the joint-offer property of the parties, while receiving the remainder //. The plaintiffs stated as the son's legal heir that the plaintiff's trial court dismissed the case and decision and the trial court's decision was upheld by the appellate court. The date, in which the plaintiff is shown to be the proprietor of the suit property as the legal heir of the son of the common predecessor, despite the fact that such a legacy was not approved, There was no inheritance change either. In favor of the defendants, the trial court completely disregarded the irregular and irregular entries in the tax papers in favor of the defendants of both the courts. The plaintiff's mere request was not justified by the plaintiff's request that in the racial table, the plaintiff's predecessor was shown as a pacer e compatibility trial court, effectively deciding each issue in the dispute between the parties. Can be created and configured. , Invite a particular issue in this regard and then the evidence of the parties in this regard and decide the dispute according to the evidence presented in this regard. Whatever the present case did not happen, the decisions and orders of the two courts, below, were set aside and the trial was held in the trial court, with the direction that a particular issue could be presented, whether the defendants. The predecessor was the real son or composer of Pisar E, and so on
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
