Appreciating the arrest and smuggling evidence of Section 9 (c) drugs, the defendant was arrested when he had four kilograms in his possession and the report received from the Franz Science Laboratory was positive about the accused in such crime. Was involved. , But they alleged that they had been acquitted, but additional writings on the weight of the banned variables were corrected, even after the testimony of the prosecution's five witnesses lengthened and taxed. Could not disperse and the witnesses agreed on everything and nothing was brought. From their mouth, which can support the crime of the accused in accordance with the available law and substance recorded by the trial court, has been maintained, under the circumstances, by the police under Section 103, CRPC mandatory provisions. Was not complied with. Some other minor contradictions were found in the statements of the prosecutor's witness, the benefit to which the accused should go, was that the accused had been acquitted in the first case against him, while the sentence was reduced. Has been proven, while maintaining the conviction of the accused, sentenced to 5 years imprisonment by the RI. , Reduced to 2 years \
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
