An attempt to compel Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 of Qatil AMD and Qutal Ahmed bail was directly charged with the cancellation of the accused when the verdict was passed and the injured trial. The court was effectively dismissed. The defendant's request for bail not only resulted in a deep appreciation of the evidence, but also cited some statements that did not collect data on the accused under any kind of assumptions, and the crime was evident with the trial court. And the co-ordinated accused had to face hard work. Appeal for bail, even on medical ground, although there was no record of him, bail on his face was approved, libelous, libelous and even misleading. , Order to guarantee guaranteed recall, withdrawn, in circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
