Article 12 (2) Convention of Convention (10 of 1984), Article 79 of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877),: Sections 42 and 54 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for nomination and permanent injunction to adjourn the case and decision. On the basis of The fraudulent and misrepresentative plaintiff allegedly appeared in court through his general attorney, who filed the case under him and accordingly the plaintiff defended the decision in favor of the plaintiff's heirs. / In the favor of the predecessor, the said decree was adopted approximately twenty years after the approval of the decree. The petitioners filed an application under section 12 (2), CPC but to set aside the judgment and order, the trial court, where they alleged that neither they nor their predecessor / The defendant had appointed someone as his lawyer, and that decision and decision had been approved. The trial court dismissed the fraud and misrepresentation by the trial court - the application filed under section 12 (2), the CPC, the appellate court appointed a subpoena and the decree passed by the trial court. The main bone of contention in the case was given by Plaintiff Ounce to prove to the General Power of Attorney that the responsibility of the resignations was binding. The witnesses of the said General Power of Attorney, who were required under the law under Article79 of this testimony, were not able to argue the case in accordance with the law and the facts which were passed by the appellate court. No interruptions The impugned order was retained and the constitutional request with no need to stand was dropped \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2012
