MUHAMMAD AZAM versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E), GUJRANWALA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY LIMITED MANDI BAHAUDDIN
Section O15 Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Sections 41 and 55 Compulsory Retirement Complaint Appeal Restrictions Penalty for compulsory retirement was imposed on an employee who was working as a meter reader in an electric supply company. After issuing the showcase notice, but filing a complaint without complaint, any investigator was held in deep sleep for more than four years due to an unlawful employee's dismissal. Attempted to get rid, he filed an appeal fourteen days after the expiry of the deadline, Employees of a plausible explanation for the non-delay were not present in the court with clear hands, which should have reached the appropriate forum at least 120 days after the Department's appeal was rejected, but it made its decision. I was shocked. In almost four years, the Labor Court properly appreciated the facts and precisely enforced the law, an appeal could not be interfered with in the Labor Court-approved order, which would otherwise have been withheld. Was
